QUOTE(tolik @ 11-26-2003 - 06:06 PM)
one more question... what kind of success have you had trying to OC the basic Kingston ValueRam... I currently have 3 sticks.
thanks.
(PS - Can't get myself to spend money on RAM yet

)
Yup, garsh and dasnufus are correct, if you aren't opening up that many windows and most of your programs aren't graphics-intensive (like video editing or photoshopping), then, it'd probably be best to go with 384. You basically want to test out how much memory you use on a daily basis, and see if you can fit it in 384. If you're running 98 or earlier, 384 should probably be plenty as the OS doesn't take up as much space. If you're running 2000 or XP, 384 is basically the borderline between enough memory and thrashing, and you essentially need to see if your daily workload is using up the 384 as more memory doesn't help speed very much if at all once you reach a certain point.
As to overclocking, I'm not sure if you want to do that with a VALUE version of memory. It might still work fine, but it's called VALUERAM for a reason

.
Supposedly, Kingston actually makes a brand of
memory that overclocks well.
I'm pretty sure they're not selling ValueRAM like that, but then, I've done very little overclocking of other components, so I'm not exactly the best authority on this.
Good Luck,
F