Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Ouch! Billionaire loses almost half his wealth - $1.16b
bargainshare.com > Home and Finance Deals > Finance and Travel
BlueTDimly
Link

I guess the lesson to learn is about diversification. Even for a billionaire, putting half of your money in a single security is completely foolish.

QUOTE
Lewis, Barrow Hanley Lose Combined $2 Billion on Bear Stakes

By Katherine Burton and Sree Vidya Bhaktavatsalam
Enlarge Image/Details

March 17 (Bloomberg) -- Joseph Lewis, the billionaire investor who bought 9.4 percent of Bear Stearns Cos. last year, lost $1.16 billion on his stake after JPMorgan Chase & Co. agreed to buy the securities firm for $2 a share.

Lewis, the New York-based firm's second-largest holder, paid an average of about $107 apiece for 11 million shares, according to a filing submitted last year to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The stake has plunged 98 percent in value since the purchases. Bear's biggest investor at year-end was money manager Barrow Hanley Mewhinney & Strauss Inc., whose 9.7 percent holding has fallen by $991 million.

New York-based JPMorgan, the third-largest U.S. bank, said yesterday it will pay about $240 million for Bear, which was crippled last week after clients pulled money and investors balked at trading with the firm because of losses on its subprime-mortgage holdings. Bear's market value was $13.6 billion at Nov. 30, the end of its fiscal year.

``This was done in the market's best interests,'' said David Hendler, an analyst at CreditSights Inc., a financial- research firm in New York. ``Unfortunately Bear Stearns shareholders are at the short end of the stick and they only got this token payment.''

Lewis, a former foreign exchange trader who was born in an apartment above a pub in London's East End, declined to comment through a spokesman. The loss is almost half his $2.5 billion fortune, as estimated by Forbes magazine in its 2007 survey.

Barrow Hanley president James Barrow didn't immediately return a phone call yesterday to the firm's Dallas headquarters.

Investment bank Morgan Stanley, the third-largest holder with a 5.4 percent stake, may have lost about $546 million since Dec. 31. James Cayne, Bear's former chief executive officer and fourth-largest holder with a 4.9 percent stake, saw the value of his holding drop by $504 million.

Bear's fifth-largest shareholder, Baltimore-based Legg Mason Capital Management, a unit of Legg Mason Inc. run by Bill Miller, may be down $493 million.

Messages left at the offices of Cayne, Miller and Jim Wiggins, a spokesman for New York-based Morgan Stanley, weren't immediately returned.

To contact the reporters on this story: Katherine Burton in New York at kburton@bloomberg.net; Sree Vidya Bhaktavatsalam in Boston at sbhaktavatsa@bloomberg.net.
Last Updated: March 17, 2008 00:25 EDT
dejavu
oh no, he's going to have to wash plates instead of tossing them after each use rolleyesold.gif
wheel
On the other hand, these are the kind of plays that these folks make, and sometimes they come out smelling like roses. After all, does he really need that $1B to live on?

kas
Screw these schmucks; how much of the money in Bear Stearns came from the little guy. I feel sorry for those on a fixed income and they depend on a monthly check from Bear Stearns to pay the bills.
BlueTDimly
I do feel sorry for the employees and those who had unvested options. You mention those who depend on a monthly check - I don't really feel for anyone who had all their eggs in the BSC basket. They should know better.
NARC
QUOTE (kas @ 3-17-08, 9:19am) *
Screw these schmucks; how much of the money in Bear Stearns came from the little guy.

Honestly? Not that much.

They are an institutional financial services company for the most part, although they get a fair amount of money from their Wealth Management business - which is mostly upper-tier customers.

The big news here is that one company can be gone in 2 days. I mean, sure it's been in trouble for a while with its hedge fund blow up, but in reality this has all come to a head in 2 days. The market is insane right now.
tolik
While i-banks sometimes make money ripping off institutional investors (hence retirement funds, etc), the only people truly burned by this deal are the ones who owned BSC shares.

I almost feel sorry for those risk-takers from my class who went to the banks. Two of whom lost their jobs this week. Almost. Who's the risk-averse pansy now? Suckers...
NARC
QUOTE (tolik @ 3-17-08, 2:50pm) *
the only people truly burned by this deal are the ones who owned BSC shares.


Now, that is the truth. The deal made for BSC is ridiculous.
Alan
We will all pay for this. Where did the gov't get the $30 billion bailout money? From us.
NARC
Nope. They printed it up on the fly. You're kidding yourself if you think that this bailout was backed by any actual money.

It might have been if we weren't spending Trillions of dollars overseas, but that topic I'm sure is more fully explored in the world politics forum.

Now, that's not to say that we won't pay for it anyway, because of course we will. We'll pay for it in the weakening of the dollar and the increase in inflation. It's stagflation time folks.
WingsOverVA
QUOTE (NARC @ 3-17-08, 6:52pm) *
Nope. They printed it up on the fly. You're kidding yourself if you think that this bailout was backed by any actual money.

It might have been if we weren't spending Trillions of dollars overseas, but that topic I'm sure is more fully explored in the world politics forum.

Now, that's not to say that we won't pay for it anyway, because of course we will. We'll pay for it in the weakening of the dollar and the increase in inflation. It's stagflation time folks.

No they did not print up any money, they just released (lent) treasury bonds. As of January the Fed had about $800 billion in treasuries and has "lent" about $400 billion in the last few weeks including this "bailout".
NARC
You're assuming that they are going to require it to be paid back.

I'm too cynical.
kas
Warshed
Evidence that even people who are supposed to be smart, and educated in the ways of money can be retarded. The run in the real estate market has been crazy, and now people are screaming bloody murder when the price of their home is dropping 10% when it rose 20-50% in the last 3-5 years. Then the mortgage lenders give out foolish mortgages to everyone, further inflating prices, and people abuse the mortgage system for all its worth. This whole mess was just a cluster "enter curse word here" of idiocy. Its a big joke, but sadly it is a joke at all our expenses. The government is run by tools, and the fed is run by a bunch of chimps. I'm sorry for venting but this whole mess could have been averted easily if money lenders didn't give out money willy nilly without documentation. Housing prices would have not risen as quickly, morons wouldn't have been given money when they weren't supposed to, and businesses like Bear Sterns wouldn't have failed. You would think we would have learned from the bubble in stocks popping in 1999, that the fed would have understood that real estate was its own bubble, but good old Alan Greenspan, the guru of economics, didn't do nothing about this whole mess.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.