Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: This report has shaken my liking of AVG...
bargainshare.com > Internet & Retail Deals > Deal Discussion
NARC
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070...-microsoft.html

QUOTE
The winner of this antivirus sweepstakes was a product called Avira, which managed to detect and defeat 71 percent of the unknown malware. Right behind it was the equally-obscure NOD32, which swept away 68 percent of the threats. The more well-known commercial products fared more poorly. Norton Antivirus and McAfee tied at a mere 24 percent, while Microsoft's OneCare did even worse by only identifying 18 percent of the new threats. Resting at the bottom of the barrel were Kaspersky and eScan at nine percent, and AVG, which detected only eight percent of malicious software in addition to producing many false positives.


I know that some of you like NOD32, but I am shocked that AVG came in this low. It's done well in other tests, but I don't really know what this guy's methodology is.

Maybe it's time to look at other options.
unsmart3d
QUOTE(NARC @ 6-8-07, 8:26am) *
Resting at the bottom of the barrel were Kaspersky and eScan

blink.gif
BlueTDimly
I'd be suspicious of the methodology. But I am getting more concerned about virus/spyware vendors being able to keep up, given the number of new nasties introduced every day.
dasnufus
this is shocking news to me. I would never imagined Kaspersky and AVG finishing near the bottom.

NAV and Mcafee finishing AHEAD of Kas and AVG? blink.gif
GTFan
It's a heuristics test for new viruses, not a test of how well a fully patched and updated AV program detects existing viruses. Not sure why he tests that way but it's not a real-world indication of how the product will perform, just an indication of how well it can detect brand-new viruses in the wild that have not had AV signature updates released for them yet. Most viruses have been around the block for a while before people get them, and their AV program should have the update.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.